New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to respond to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s lawyer’s question regarding the timing of the AAP chief’s arrest.
Hearing a plea by Arvind Kejriwal against his arrest in the Delhi excise policy case, the apex court observed that liberty is “very exceedingly important”. It asked ED’s lawyer to respond to Arvind Kejriwal’s query as to why he was arrested just before the Lok Sabha elections.
Arvind Kejriwal was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21. “Liberty is very exceedingly important, you can’t deny that. The last question is with regard to the timing of the arrest, which they (Arvind Kejriwal’s lawyer) have pointed out, the timing of the arrest, soon before the general elections,” Justice Sanjiv Khanna told ASG SV Raju.
Earlier this month, the Delhi high court upheld Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest, saying the agency had no other option as the former had not been joining the probe.
Before the court’s observation today, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Arvind Kejriwal, said MP Magunta Sreenivasulu Reddy (MSR) was forced to make a statement against Arvind Kejriwal in lieu of bail to his son Raghav, reported Live Law.
He said MSR broke down due to son’s continuous incarceration and gave a statement to implicate Kejriwal.
Singhvi said MSR contradicted his earlier statement, and the very next day, Raghav was granted bail.
Singhvi pointed out that Arvind Kejriwal’s aide Vijay Nair was accused of receiving kickbacks. He was arrested in November 2022. Kejriwal was arrested in March 2024. “No explanation for not arresting during this time,” he said.
“Raghav initially made no allegation…his wife attempted suicide. He sought interim bail, and the special judge dismissed. His maternal grandmother fell, was in the ICU. The Delhi high court granted him interim bail. ED challenged it,” Singhvi said, per the website.
Join our whatsapp group for Latest updates