Raipur: The Supreme Court has delivered its verdict in the Jhiram Valley massacre case, rejecting the NIA’s plea and affirming that the conspiracy aspect was not within its purview. Vinod Verma, a political advisor to the CM, spoke at a press conference, recalling the Naxal attack just before the 2013 assembly elections, resulting in the tragic death of 32 leaders and activists. He emphasized that this incident marked one of the largest political massacres in the world’s democratic history. The NIA had initiated an investigation, and according to Verma, their chargesheets did not include the names of top Naxal leaders like Ganpati and Ramana.
Verma questioned the intention behind omitting these influential names, suggesting the central government’s involvement in shielding someone. The investigation was then taken over by Chhattisgarh Police, and after legal battles in trial courts, high courts, and the Supreme Court, the NIA’s plea was rejected, allowing Chhattisgarh Police to proceed with the investigation.
Verma highlighted that a commission had been formed to investigate the entire conspiracy, raising questions about the CBI’s refusal to conduct an inquiry despite Dr. Raman Singh’s request. Verma alleged that Raman Singh concealed the entire matter despite the serious implications. He further stated that an independent investigation was essential to unveil the truth.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s rejection of the NIA plea in the Jhiram Valley massacre case marks a significant development. The demand for a thorough investigation by the Chhattisgarh Police signals a renewed effort to uncover the truth behind this tragic incident. The political dimensions and the complexity of the case underscore the importance of a comprehensive inquiry. As the legal proceedings unfold, the nation will keenly watch how the investigative agencies handle this sensitive matter, especially with allegations of a political conspiracy hovering over the proceedings.