In a major twist, the Indian Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) in a long-standing financial dispute with Reliance Infrastructure. The court allowed a curative petition filed by DMRC, ordering a refund of Rs 8,000 crore paid to Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL), a subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure.
This significant verdict comes after a series of legal battles. In 2017, an arbitral award had directed DMRC to pay Rs 8,000 crore to DAMEPL for allegedly terminating a concessionaire agreement for operating the Delhi Airport Metro line prematurely. DMRC challenged this award in the Supreme Court, but their initial appeal and review petition were dismissed.
However, DMRC filed a curative petition, a rarely used legal recourse meant for situations where a grave injustice has been done. The Supreme Court accepted the petition and in a recent ruling, found merit in DMRC’s arguments. The court acknowledged that an error in judgment had been made and ordered Reliance Infrastructure to return the Rs 8,000 crore received by DAMEPL.
This verdict has significant implications for both parties. For DMRC, it provides much-needed financial relief. The Rs 8,000 crore sum is a substantial amount, and its return will likely ease some of the financial burden on the public transport body. For Reliance Infrastructure, the decision represents a major setback. The company had already moved the Delhi High Court to enforce the arbitral award, and this Supreme Court ruling throws those plans into disarray.
The legal repercussions of this judgment are also being debated. Some legal experts believe it could set a precedent for revisiting past arbitral awards, while others caution that the curative petition process is meant for exceptional circumstances and shouldn’t be seen as a way to routinely challenge arbitration decisions.
Overall, the Supreme Court’s ruling in the DMRC-Reliance Infrastructure case is a significant development in the ongoing dispute. It highlights the complexities of arbitration cases and the power of curative petitions in extraordinary situations. The financial impact for both parties will be substantial, and the legal implications will likely be debated for some time to come.
Join our whatsapp group for Latest updates